IAP-24-101

Disentangling the interactions between climate change and land-use change in a 3D world

There is now unequivocal evidence that land use and climate change cause biodiversity change. Changing biodiversity can have drastic impacts on ecosystems and the value we derive from nature including, not least, the provisioning of food. Yet, the need to feed people is precisely what drives most land-use change, and it is also responsible for a large proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, there is an increasing recognition that climate at ecologically relevant scales – ‘microclimate – is directly affected by both land-use and climate change, and that microclimate, in turn, likely mediates the response of ectotherms like insect pollinators. This project will disentangle the various interacting factors at play to better understand how feeding the human population impacts insect pollinators, and vice versa.

Click on an image to expand

Image Captions

A TOMST TMS-4 datalogger deployed at a field site in Scotland

Methodology

The project will be largely desk-based, utilising existing databases to identify spatially explicit responses of insect pollinators to land-use and climate change. We will expand on previous studies, including by external collaborator Dr Tim Newbold, through the integration of vegetation structure and microclimate data. This will involve a combination of remote sensing, microclimate modelling and potentially some fieldwork to validate model outputs.

Project Timeline

Year 1

The first year will be used to build the basic database of insect pollinator species, their geographic locations, and responses to documented land-use and climate change. Most
data will be sourced from the PREDICTS project. The spread of data across different geographic regions and vegetation types will be assessed, and targeted manual additions from other data sources will be carried out as needed.

Year 2

The second year will focus on building vegetation structure metrics and microclimate models for the sites included in the database produced in year 1. This will involve collation of various different sources of remote sensed data and integration into a mechanistic microclimate model, to map microclimate across study sites in high resolution. Microclimate data will be summarised into bioclimatic variables of particular relevance to insects, for multiple heights depending on the height typically occupied by the species of interest. With these data, we will begin building statistical models of the interacting effects of land-use and climate change on insect pollinator species globally.

Year 3

In the final year, we will expand on results from year 2 by exploring whether modelled relationships are consistent across geographic regions and predominant vegetation types. There will be scope here to explore how the responses of insect pollinators in turn impacts the crops that they pollinate, with a view to extrapolation in space and time to better understand impacts on future crop yields.

Year 3.5

The final 6 months will be used to synthesise previous results. If there are different responses depending on insect pollinator, geographic region and/or crops, we will explore here the potential policy implications of our findings. As an example, we may consider the role of agroforestry in maintaining yields through provisioning of microclimate refugia for insect pollinators.

Training
& Skills

Training will be given in microclimate modelling, spatial analyses and programming in R, Python and Google Earth Engine as needed. Fieldwork would utilise microclimate sensors, for which we will provide training in designing representative sensor networks.

References & further reading

• De Frenne, Pieter, Florian Zellweger, Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, Brett R. Scheffers, Kristoffer Hylander, Miska Luoto, Mark Vellend, Kris Verheyen, and Jonathan Lenoir. 2019. ‘Global Buffering of Temperatures under Forest Canopies’. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3 (5): 744. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0842-1.
• Hudson, Lawrence N., Tim Newbold, Sara Contu, Samantha L. L. Hill, Igor Lysenko, Adriana De Palma, Helen R. P. Phillips, et al. 2017. ‘The Database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) Project’. Ecology and Evolution 7 (1): 145–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2579.
• Kemppinen, Julia, Jonas J. Lembrechts, Koenraad Van Meerbeek, Jofre Carnicer, Nathalie Isabelle Chardon, Paul Kardol, Jonathan Lenoir, et al. 2024. ‘Microclimate, an Important Part of Ecology and Biogeography’. Global Ecology and Biogeography n/a (n/a): e13834. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13834.
• Lembrechts, Jonas J., Johan van den Hoogen, Juha Aalto, Michael B. Ashcroft, Pieter De Frenne, Julia Kemppinen, Martin Kopecký, et al. 2021. ‘Global Maps of Soil Temperature’. Global Change Biology n/a (n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16060.
• Newbold, Tim, Lawrence N. Hudson, Samantha L. L. Hill, Sara Contu, Igor Lysenko, Rebecca A. Senior, Luca Börger, et al. 2015. ‘Global Effects of Land Use on Local Terrestrial Biodiversity’. Nature 520 (7545): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324.
• Senior, Rebecca A., Jane K. Hill, Pamela González del Pliego, Laurel K. Goode, and David P. Edwards. 2017. ‘A Pantropical Analysis of the Impacts of Forest Degradation and Conversion on Local Temperature’. Ecology and Evolution 7 (19): 7897–7908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3262.
• Williams, Jessica J., and Tim Newbold. 2020. ‘Local Climatic Changes Affect Biodiversity Responses to Land Use: A Review’. Diversity and Distributions 26 (1): 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12999.

Apply Now